Bogus Science And Unverifiable Claims Drive Cat Hatred In New Zealand

After news of a now-canceled children’s cat hunting contest made international headlines this week, the usual suspects came out of the woodwork with wild, unsupported claims that cats — not humans, not human industrial processes, not human-driven habitat loss, wind farms or agricultural pesticides — are singlehandedly responsible for wiping out New Zealand’s native birds and the extinction of an arbitrary number of avian species.

One of the people leading the charge is Helen Blackie, a “biosecurity expert” who told the BBC that cats are responsible for the extinction of six native bird species in New Zealand.

Blackie doesn’t say where she got that information, but noted cat-hating Kiwi Gareth Morgan’s site claims that cats have killed nine native bird species, and attributes the information to a study, “A global review of the impacts of invasive cats on island endangered vertebrates.”

The “study” was published by academics in Spain and California without boots on the ground in New Zealand and is not actually a study at all. It’s a meta-analysis of prior studies, none of which count the number of feral, stray and pet cats in New Zealand, nor do they offer anything resembling a measure of how many birds are actually killed by cats.

Notably, the study does not say cats are responsible for the extinction of nine bird species.

close up shot of a stray cat
Credit: Mehmet Turgut Kirkgoz/Pexels

Much like their US bird-conservationist counterparts, the authors of the study cannot say how many cats actually live in New Zealand and have no observational data about feline predatory habits.

They rely on the same methods the US studies do, which is to say they collect data from unrelated studies — including a study measuring the impact of all predators on wildlife in the aftermath of wild fires in urban environments, a study on the way pet cat personalities impact how their owners view them, and a study on cat behavior in Culver City, California — stir the data into a pot of numbers, and massage the numbers until they get the desired results.

In this case, the “desired results” are any suitably impressive-sounding figure for the total number of native birds killed by cats in New Zealand. The authors aren’t conducting a scientific investigation to find out how those native birds died, they’ve already decided that cats are the reason and they’re misrepresenting data from unrelated studies to support that conclusion. That is not science.

Of course their conclusion has no basis in reality. How is it possible that a bunch of researchers on entirely different continents are able to come up with accurate figures on cat predation in New Zealand without any actual data about cats in New Zealand, without a population count of cats in New Zealand, and without a single observational study to draw information from?

How does a study of coyote and cat interactions in Culver City, California have any bearing on cats killing birds in New Zealand, an island country 6,700 miles away with habitats that bear little or no resemblance to California? Coyotes don’t even exist in New Zealand!

How does a self-reported questionnaire about the personalities of pet cats by American cat owners tell researchers anything about the behavior of feral cats in rural New Zealand?

How does a study about the Persian squirrel on Greek island ecosystems tell a research team anything about the impact of cats on flightless birds in a completely different environment, in a different part of the world, with different types of trees and cover, different native fauna and weather systems?

How does a study of alpine ecosystems inform estimates of cat predation in the temperate and subtropical ecosystems of Aotearoa?

view of a stray cat on a city street
Credit: Boys in Bristol Photography/Pexels

This sort of buffet-style, cherry-picking nonsense wouldn’t pass muster in an undergraduate class in the hard sciences, yet somehow it’s not only published in peer-reviewed conservation journals, it’s reported breathlessly and credulously by reporters at outlets like NPR, the BBC and the Guardian, who don’t even bother to read beyond the abstract.

Their claims are further undermined by their inexplicable assertion that feral cats and domestic cats are not the same thing, when in fact they are the same species: felis catus. They are indistinguishable because they are the same. They look identical and have the same genetics. The only difference is that house cats have homes and ferals do not.

No one is claiming that cats don’t have an impact on the environment. It would be foolish to think they don’t.

But if anyone — especially journalists with influential platforms and researchers cloaked in authority thanks to the veneer of real science — wants to make the case that cats are the primary force leading to declining numbers of native bird populations, then the burden of proof is on them, and it’s a high one.

We’re talking about life here, the lives of fully sentient animals with their own rich internal thoughts and feelings. You don’t just casually call for their extirpation or send children off with rifles to arbitrarily shoot them like little serial killers in training.

If you want to make the case, do the work. Get the grants. Hire the personnel. Do it right. The Washington, D.C. Cat Count even has a free toolkit for other communities to conduct their own feline census, so they can make informed decisions. But if you’re unwilling or unable to do the work, then stop spreading misinformation, because it has tragic consequences for real-world animals, and their blood is on your hands.

Top image credit Aleksandr Nadyojin/Pexels

9 thoughts on “Bogus Science And Unverifiable Claims Drive Cat Hatred In New Zealand”

    1. Yes, I heard that. Archduke Franz Ferdinand was actually killed by a devious Calico, and Mussolini was installed by a cabal of shadowy Siamese cats who wanted all of Italy’s fish for themselves.

      We should totally make a documentary about this and put it up on Youtube.

      Liked by 1 person

      1. 👍Would of been great if cats killed that monster Mussolini as my parents left Italy to come here because of him.

        Liked by 2 people

      2. That’s a great article, Big Buddy. If NPR had not done away with their comment feature it would have been a great rebuttal of their trash science report.

        Liked by 1 person

      3. The Illumeowtie, the Anunnaki, Evil Space Lord Xenu, the 1929 New York Yankees and the people who committed the NASA moon landing hoax, knowing full well it was cats who got there first and called dibs on it as a pristine litter box. Little Buddy is onto all of them! Nothing gets past him.


  1. Excellent statement, Big Buddy! If only people understood that there are well done studies, but also not-so-well-done studies. They should teach study analysis in schools like they teach analysis of literature. I’ve had a lifelong interest in wilderness, wild spaces, and wild critters. I want them all preserved. But those wild things aren’t going to come into your home and head bonk you. Cat and human interaction is pretty astonishing. So my focus is now on celebrating and advocating for animals I can actually live with. And, there are other ways of dealing with any feral conflicts with wildlife, like moving feral colonies.

    Liked by 1 person

    1. TNR, keeping the colonies under the care of managers, putting breakaway collars with bells on the ferals after they’re TNR’d or given veterinary attention, clearing ground cover near the cat colonies so in addition to the collar bells, the cats have reduced ability to stalk and pounce.

      The Washington DC Cat Count showed cat lovers and bird lovers could find common ground and work together on an essential project, but it’s hard work, and people think just randomly shooting cats is easier.

      On a positive note, two US men who killed their neighbor’s cats were convicted of felonies and sentenced to prison time, so it looks like at least some prosecutors are making use of the new animal welfare laws enacted just a few years ago.

      Liked by 1 person

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s